- Helping the Mind Deal with Climate Change Futures
Brigitte Pawliw-Fry & Manjana Milkoreit
Climate change
is a problem that reaches far into the future. Although one could debate to
what extent climate change impacts are observable today, scientists and most
policy-makers have no doubt that the accumulated effects of humanity’s economic
activity over the last 100 years will have consequences for centuries, even
millennia to come.
Most of the possible
future changes in the climate system are very difficult to imagine. It seems
even harder to think about the impacts climate change might force upon
societies. At the same time, addressing climate change requires decision-making
in the present. UN negotiators, national policy-makers, senators, voters,
consumers. NGOs, business leaders and investors all need to have some kind of
idea/understanding what the future will look like in order to make choices
about their actions today – committing your country to GHG emission reductions,
lobbying against such reductions, mobilizing your community to live more
sustainably or investing in the Alberta oil sands. Unfortunately human beings struggle
with making good decisions in response to climate change, and one of the main reasons
for this weakness might be a general lack of imagination concerning the more
distant future.
Evolution seems
to have a lot to do with our inability to imagine what’s ahead. Initially
humans’ most pressing concerns were survival, food and shelter today and left
very little time to think about the next day, week or even year. In modern
societies our planning horizon has expanded to cover a number of years, maybe a
decade. But although our life expectancy is approaching 100 years, and our
grandchildren might see the year 2150, we rarely think beyond the year 2020. And
we have absolutely no idea what 2080 might look like.
So what do we do
about that? What tools can help us imagine our changing planet in the years to
come? It turns out that scientific knowledge is
pretty useless for painting a picture of the future that the non-scientific
mind can actually see. Our brains need help to transform science into images of
more and less likely realities in the form of visuals, stories, ideas, and emotions
– we need art and culture to help us see,
feel and experience possible worlds before they have come to pass.
An emerging literary
genre known as climate fiction, or cli-fi for short, is trying to do
exactly that. Writing stories about scientists, college students, corporations and
politicians, who live in a significantly changed future due to climate change,
they try to introduce us to the things to come. Well-known authors, including Margaret Atwood and Nathaniel
Rich, are part of this
new trend that might prove to be the missing link between climate science and
climate action.
When
writing the cli-fi novel Back
to the Garden, a story set around the end of the century, author Clara Hume
was motivated by her desire to change people’s minds about climate change here
and now:
I tried to imagine a credible future
that would paint a picture different than our current world—in hopes that
people would be inspired to respect nature now, given that a dystopian future
would not be desirous. … I hope to entertain people with a good story
about characters who are in the midst of being lost in a new world and who must
work out their own losses, personal demons, and redemptions. The other hope is
that readers will think harder about the choices we make today that will affect
the planet tomorrow, and really are already affecting the planet.
Bridging the
present and the future with a work of fiction is not an easy task. Asked about
the importance of science for her writing, Hume emphasized that she used
current scientific knowledge for her imagination, and also consulted scientists
and experts who live in the place where she locates her story. Making a novel’s
future scenario scientifically viable could be important if cli-fi authors seek
to have social-political impacts. However, it is not hard to imagine that data
– and the permanent desire for more scientific certainty – might get in the way
of creative writing.
Hume seems at
ease with uncertainty, which gives her and probably most creative writers a
real advantage over scientists and policy-makers, who tend to worry about the
not-yet-knowable. Here is what Hume thinks about the most likely trajectory of
humanity and planet Earth:
So
many variables will contribute to our future that it's tough to imagine exactly
what it will be like. I use science news articles and books to understand the
current thinking on the path of climate change. Combine this with our rapid
resource extraction (including oil sands), natural resource depletion,
pollution, erosion, dying fisheries/oceans, and human desire for wealth and
convenience, I don't see any other destination than a far different world in
the future. It will be bad in that many people will probably die due to
starvation, disease, and other maladies caused by climate change and reduction
of healthy natural resources, including water, air, forests, and land.
Eventually, the positive might be that surviving humans might learn how to live
within the limits of our ecological webs and nature might rebuild
herself.
This is a pretty
grim picture, yet, Hume remains optimistic that her book can make a difference:
I
hope that I've written this book in such a way that people will come away not
afraid but encouraged to do the right things for our planet.
We thank Clara Hume for answering our questions.
Danny Dan Daniel @leinadmoolb now @ManjanaM @vgalaz @owengaffney @DavidAWelch I LIKE ThIS, well said!! CLI FI CENTRAL may i report here?
ReplyDeletesee my blog CLI FI CENTRAL "pcillu101" in blogspot arena
http://pcillu101.blogspot.com for CLI FI CENTRAL archives
ReplyDeleteDear Bloggers here: while CLI Fi can help raise awareness, yes, and we need more cli fi novels to raise awarenss, yes, the real fact is that we are a species, the human species, are doomed doomed doomed. We are hardwired sadly to not care about anything futher away in the future than our grandchildren, so about 100 years is all we care about in the future, so there is no planning going on for 30 generations from now, and most tragcailly, very few people care about life in 2500 AD or so. That is our predicament. CLI Fi summer reads can help, but they are in the end mere band aids when the patient, our EARTH, is suffering a major HEART ATTACK. this the truth we face. and we are hardwired NOT To want to face this. for some reason i am hardwired to face this and am trying to raise the alarm for our descendants 30 generations from now, BUt the media does not care and anyways, the media thinks I'm nuts to care about people in the year 2500 AD. the media wants lady gaga and sports on TV to escape with. SIGh
ReplyDeleteThanks for the great article and bringing to light the cli-fi genre as well as Clara Hume's Back to the Garden.
ReplyDeleteAnd Manjana, quick note: Aronofsky's 'Noah' set to flood the 'cli fi' zone in 2014
ReplyDeleteThe emerging genre of "cli fi" movies, from "Day After Tomorrow" to
"The Road," is about to get some Old Word company early next year when
Darren Aronofsky's "Noah" is released in March. Yes, that Noah, and
yes, that flood.
Some 5,000 years ago in the Biblical past.
That's where Aronofsky has headed, way back in time, to tell a cli fi
story set not in some dystopian future but via a dreadful, tragic
Biblical legend.
Starring Russell Crowe, Emma Watson, Anthony Hopkins and a real Ark,
this is the kind of Hollywood film that will put Superstorm Sandy in
its place.
"Noah'' was shot on location in Iceland -- and in parts of Long Island
during Superstorm Sandy -- and the film is now in its post-production
editing process.
Maybe that Biblical flood was a hoax perpetrated by some Hebrew
scribes, in much the same way the global warming is said to be a hoax
perpetrated by the good Al Gore as part of his climate shenanigans to
get rich(er) off polar fraud? Aronofsky, educated at the same Harvard
where Gore invented the Internet and was the male lead for Erich
Segal's "Love Story," has put a lot of time and effort in his "Noah"
project, as any quick take of his Twitter feed will attest. He cares
about this film, and he has put his cast and crew through the ancient
flood "event" in order to do two things: entertain audiences with a
vivid, detailed visit a terrible tale from the Bible, while at the
same time setting up a global wake up call about what humans are doing
to the climate today.
The 'flood" can't happen again? Think again.
While "cli fi" has been defined by NPR and the Christian Science
Monitor as taking place only in the present or near future -- in
novels such as Barbara Kingsolver's "Flight Behavior" and Nathaniel
Rich's Superstorm Sandy novel "Odds Against Tomorrow" -- in fact,
''cli fi'' can take place in the distant past, too. Even in Noah's
time. Even during the Flood, the flood to end all floods.
While the marketing for "Noah" has not begun, Aronofsky's cockamamie
idea to film a global warming warning call based on an imaginary
"event" some 5,000 years ago in the Biblical past. has legs. Long
legs.
This movie could become a global hit, and for one main reason, every
nation on Earth, is the direct path of the next big flood and it could
be curtains for the human race.
Sounds like sci fi? But this time it's ''cli fi," with a stellar cast
and computer graphics to tickle your Noahic imagination.